Posted in General, tagged aldous huxley, bbc, cs lewis, dr who, fantasy, history, humour, jfk, science fiction, television on Friday, November 22, 2013|
Leave a Comment »
So I had occasion to look up the spelling of Aldous Huxley's name a while back. (I can never, for some reason, remember whether it's 'Huxley' or 'Huxly.') I did it the obvious way: I typed it into Google, knowing it would correct me if I were wrong. (I wasn't, as it happens.)
Anyways, I learned this strange and interesting fact, from the right-hand side-bar where they put info-results for famous people and the like…
Slight mirth ensued.
Read Full Post »
Posted in General, tagged books, fantasy, science, science fiction on Thursday, July 26, 2012|
8 Comments »
This was originally posted on my old site, sometime in early 2011 or late 2010. I've added a single paragraph at the top, to address a subject I should have mentioned at the time, but didn't.
Before posting the article as originally written, I'd like to point out that the main biological/evolutionary premises in the novel are probably, well, dubious, at best. Not that I'm any kind of biologist, but they seem pretty much of a stretch to me. That said, the book reads more like fantasy than science fiction anyway, and it's internally consistent, so—unless you're a stickler for hard SF—I don't think it detracts much. As with most SF and all fantasy, we rely on suspension of disbelief. (A thought comes to mind; I can't think of a single SF or fantasy novel which deals properly with evolution. Hard SF is strict about physics and chemistry, but the biological sciences seem to still be treated to the good old 'half a paragraph of sciencey-sounding babble followed by some distracting action,' before the reader has chance to look too hard. I wonder why that is. Does anyone know of a writer—or even a single novel—that bucks this trend?)
And here's the rest of the article, as originally posted.
Read Full Post »